🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.